Derry students return to class after bomb threat
Some parents waited four hours to pick up students at Derry Area Middle School and High School when a “low-level” bomb threat forced an evacuation of more than 1,200 students.
Derry police said nothing was found when the Region 13 Canine Unit used bomb-sniffing dogs to sweep the complex on the campus on Route 982 in Derry Township.
Superintendent David Welling declined to release additional details about the threat.
Welling asked parents to talk with their children and to contact the district if they have any information that could aid authorities.
Welling said the district will review its emergency procedures, including traffic-control patterns. Parents were asked to produce photo identification, per district policy.
The schools began to evacuate to the football stadium at about 9:30 a.m. he said.
Parents were sent email, text and phone messages at about 11:30 a.m. The alert said students were being moved to nearby Grandview Elementary School.
Welling said students were given lunch at the school, and all high school and middle school students were fed by 1 p.m. The older students returned to their building about 45 minutes later.
About 400 of the 1,247 students were released early to parents, he said.
Stacey Federoff is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6660 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
“Even though it was an inconvenience for parents, their kids were safe and that's our first concern,” Welling said. “We recognize this is a disruption to everybody and we appreciate their patience.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.