Pittsburgh eliminates two light-rail stops
The T station at the corner of Coast and Broadway Avenue's in Beechview Friday morning October 12, 2012.
Photo by James Knox | Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Sharlene McCombs scowled on Friday afternoon as Port Authority of Allegheny County crews worked to remove concrete islands at two former light-rail stops along Broadway Avenue in Beechview.
Port Authority in June closed the stops and nine others in an effort to make its T system run more efficiently. That didn't appease some riders who lost convenient stops adjacent to their homes and businesses.
McCombs, 39, lives next to the former Coast T stop at Coast and Broadway avenues, which is being permanently removed along with the nearby Boustead stop at Boustead Street and Broadway. Between 50 and 100 people a day used the Coast stop, while fewer than 50 people a day used Boustead, according to Port Authority data.
“I don't like it one bit,” McCombs said of losing the Coast stop. “It doesn't ruin my life or anything. I can walk to the next stop (several hundred yards downhill). I'm more concerned about the elderly and people with disabilities.”
Port Authority originally planned to close the Hampshire stop — the one McCombs uses now — instead of Coast, but reconsidered in response to concerns from local business owners and residents who thought the Hampshire stop better served the neighborhood's business district.
Saul Franco, 40, of Beechview, owner of the Tienda La Jimenez market at Coast and Broadway, would have preferred the original plan.
Franco said he lost the Coast stop next to his market while the Hampshire stop remained open in front of the IGA store.
“It's not fair, but hey, there's not much you can do,” he said, adding he hasn't yet noticed a drop-off in business because of the Coast stop closure.
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.