Share This Page

Work on Flight 93 Memorial detailed to historical society

| Saturday, Oct. 27, 2012, 12:02 a.m.
National Park ranger Adam Shaffer outlines plans for the proposed Flight 93 National Memorial at a recent Chestnut Ridge Historical Society meeting. Marilyn Forbes | for the Daily Courier 0ct 2012

If work continues as planned, the Flight 93 National Memorial in Somerset will be completed and ready to open sometime in 2014.

Adam Shaffer of the National Park Service recently presented an update to members of the Chestnut Ridge Historical Society.

“He is a very knowledgeable fellow,” Eileen Rose of the Chestnut Ridge Historical Society said of Shaffer. “We are very honored and pleased to have him tonight to tell us about the memorial.”

A year after the fatal airliner crash on Sept. 11, 2001, government officials decided to erect a memorial at that location to replace the makeshift tributes, Shaffer said. They also wanted to have a more permanent and structured monument where the 40 passengers and crew members lost their lives while attempting to stop the terrorist attack planned that day.

“These people were true heroes,“ he said. “The Shanksville site is truly sacred ground, truly holy ground.”

Shaffer told of the attacks and briefly touched upon some personal stories related to them.

“It was all very well-planned,” Shaffer said, explaining that the terrorists apparently researched the type of airplane that had to be used, flight schedules and patterns, and even booked their seats aboard all four flights in a fashion that would give them easy access to carry out their plan.\

“They started an attack on America that then became an attack on all of humanity,” he said.

In the 30 minutes that the passengers of Flight 93 were detained prior to the crash,Shaffer said, they were able to piece together through phone calls what was happening with the other attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

“They realized through phone calls that they were a part of this suicide attack,” he said.

When it was established that a memorial should be erected, a contest was held asking people to submit their design ideas. Hundreds of entries were received. They were then judged by a panel that included family members of those who lost their lives, design architects and park officials, Shaffer said.

The new design was chosen, and work has been in progress to complete the project.

A large section of the wall was completed and dedicated last year on the 10th anniversary of the disaster, he noted.

The park is in the process of planting oak and maple trees, symbolizing the 40 lost lives.

Also, Shaffer said the park is gathering oral histories from eyewitnesses, air traffic controllers, relatives and others concerning their personal experiences that day.

“This will represent a wide group of people who were involved in some shape or form with this,” he said.

Once the visitor center, complex and walkways are completed, the new memorial will be open to the public.

Shaffer explained that the memorial was designed to complement the area.

“This memorial will be special to the landscape,” Shaffer said. “Quiet in reverence, yet powerful in form.”

Marilyn Forbes is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.