Timing leads to traffic light hassles
Murrysville Council this week heard a lengthy presentation from Trans Associates of Pittsburgh, hired in August to begin a study of traffic light deficiencies along Route 22.
The lights along the heavily traveled highway have malfunctioned for about a decade, Chief Administrator Jim Morrison said at a previous council meeting.
Timing differences with camera controls are causing problems, particularly on side streets, where vehicle detection is not always sufficient to switch the lights.
“You could get a green light at Trafford (Road), a red light at Gates (Avenue) and a green light at Branthoover (Cut-off),” said Mark Szewcow of Trans Associates.
Several recommendations were discussed on Wednesday, but no action was taken.
The $9,800 study was paid for with capital-improvements reserve funds. Council President Joan Kerns noted the anticipated cost to “address all deficiencies” is $43,500.
“We've got to have that flow in the morning and evening. We can argue all we want. ... I think you have just got to decide. Do we want to fix it or not?” said Mayor Bob Brooks.
Morrison declined to release the study, saying it remains under review.
A second phase of the project would involve collecting traffic data at the intersections. Morrison said the municipality has applied for a grant to cover that portion of the study, which would cost $22,000.
In other business, council agreed to authorize advertisement of an ordinance to revise its construction, roads and streets code to address the criteria for acceptance of new streets into the municipal system. It states that council will consider only streets that are in an approved housing plan. At least 75 percent of a development must be completed before its roads are accepted.
Once the municipality assumes ownership of a road, it is responsible for maintenance, including snow removal.
Council unanimously tabled a resolution to enter into a transfer agreement, under which the state would provide a lump sum of $1.77 million for Murrysville to take back ownership of a 3.7-mile stretch of Logan Ferry Road.
“Are we going to make any money on this over the long term? No,” Morrison said.
He noted that $15,000 in storm sewer work and easement grants would be the municipality's responsibility. Road improvements would become the municipality's responsibility, and it would lose the $9,000 the state pays Murrysville annually for snow removal.
Council heard from Jim Brucker, manager of the Franklin Township Municipal Sanitary Authority, regarding septage fees. The authority seeks to serve as the municipality's exclusive treatment provider.
Some residents disputed the necessity of pumping private septic systems; others said they preferred contracting with individual services that might not agree to a single disposal mandate.
Council discussed its animal services contract, up for renewal with Hoffman Kennels. A group of citizens recently told council about alleged abuses.
State dog officer Bruce Kinnick told staff that he believes the Delmont facility is a professional operation with well-maintained kennels, according to an agenda summary.
Councilmans Ron Summerhill and Jeff Kepler said they would visit the kennels.
Council set trick or treat from 6-8 p.m. Oct. 31 and announced a veterans appreciation breakfast Nov. 9 at 9 a.m. at the Murrysville Senior Center, free for veterans and spouses.
Mary Pickels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-5401 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.