HARRISBURG — The drive to divest the state from the sale of liquor is far from dead despite the lack of support to pass legislation this year, House Majority Leader Mike Turzai said on Thursday.
The Bradford Woods Republican said he will make another push to sell the state stores in the 2013-14 session.
“Oh no, not at all,” Turzai said when reporters asked him whether the fight to privatize liquor stores is over.
It's been a stumbling block for previous governors who favored privatization. Former Republican Govs. Dick Thornburgh and Tom Ridge were unable to win legislative support primarily because of opposition from the union representing state store workers.
“We completely changed the dynamics,” Turzai said after the 2011-12 session ended on Wednesday.
“This is one session. We put the spotlight on” the Liquor Control Board.
“It's been an agency interested in taking care of itself,” he said.
If the Senate confirms Gov. Tom Corbett's nominee to the control board — Kenneth Trujillo, a Philadelphia lawyer and Democrat — the Republican governor would have two of the board's three members.
That would help the overall effort by having an agency that's not “an impediment to real change,” Turzai said.
Though Turzai presented several privatization plans, Corbett will have to tell lawmakers how he would change the liquor system for a plan to gain momentum, Turzai said.
Corbett has been supportive of the concept but has not publicly laid out a plan. He will do so next year, spokesman Kevin Harley said.
Brad Bumsted is thestate Capitol reporter for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 717-787-1405 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.