CSX looks to build rail and truck terminal in Allegheny
Railroad giant CSX narrowed its search for a location to build a major $50 million train and truck terminal to two sites in Western Pennsylvania, officials said Tuesday.
CSX would not identify the possible locations for the facility, where freight shipments could be transferred between trains and trucks, potentially easing pressure on the region's highways and cutting costs for companies that ship large amounts of goods.
“There aren't many sites that meet all of the criteria,” said Dewitt Peart, executive vice president of economic development at the Downtown-based Allegheny Conference on Community Development, noting the site needs to be close to the company's rail lines and to an interstate highway.
Peart, who has knowledge of the terminal talks, said one site being considered is near the company's rail line and Interstate 79 in Allegheny County; the other is near the rail line and I-376 in Beaver County.
Places that fit the bill include a former Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad rail yard in McKees Rocks and the site of the former LTV Steel plant in Aliquippa.
Reached by phone on Tuesday, developer Charles Betters, who owns the LTV site, said, “If I am (one of two finalists), nobody told me about it.”
Taris A. Vrcek, executive director of the McKees Rocks Community Development Corp., welcomed the possibility on the P&LE site.
“Hopefully, there is an opportunity there. It's a site that we've been looking to develop for a long time,” Vrcek said.
Company CEO Michael Ward said the terminal will occupy 90 acres and be able to handle about 50,000 containers a year, with room to expand to handle up to twice that number.
Ward said the company plans to announce its choice within three to six months. Similar facilities are located in Pitcairn and near New Stanton, neither of which CSX owns.
Construction is expected to start in early 2014 and finish by early 2015, creating about 100 permanent jobs, Ward said.
The rail yard's opening will coincide with the completion of CSX's larger, $850 million project to increase rail freight hauling between the Midwest and the Mid-Atlantic ports. The completion of a $5.2 billion expansion of the Panama Canal should double shipping capacity there, and Ward said that would increase traffic to Eastern seaboard ports.
CSX is covering $525 million of the costs of the so-called National Gateway project. State and federal money is covering the rest, including Pennsylvania's contribution of $35 million.
“This project is a prime example of how to leverage public and private dollars to improve our nation's infrastructure,” said U.S. Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Forest Hills.
Aside from building the Pittsburgh-area terminal and three others in Pennsylvania and Ohio, CSX is increasing the clearance for trains in areas along the corridor so they can haul taller, double-stacked containers, effectively doubling capacity, officials said. That includes raising the roof in the 132-year-old J&L Tunnel in the South Side.
Company and government officials visited the Southside Works site Tuesday morning. CSX expects to finish that $13 million project next year.
Ward said the projects will “alleviate congestion and enable our customers to better leverage rail,” which he called “the most environmentally friendly way to ship goods over land.”
PennDOT Secretary Barry Schoch said the project should reduce congestion and improve safety by reducing the number of large trucks on highways.
David Taylor of the Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association said, “Anybody who makes anything or buys anything or sells anything, when infrastructure is improved, it's going to be good for business.”
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.