Steel beam delivery to affect Trafford traffic
Steel beams for the Trafford Bridge construction arrived at the site via truck on Monday, October 29.
Photo by Lillian DeDomenic | For the Penn Trafford Star
Drivers in Trafford should give themselves some extra time to get through town for the next week because of the delivery of beams for the new Trafford Veterans Memorial Bridge.
State Department of Transportation officials say weekday traffic might become congested as trucks follow the detour from Forbes Road onto Route 130 to deliver the beams to the construction site near Brinton Avenue.
Those deliveries were scheduled to begin Oct. 29 but were delayed by a couple of days because of weather conditions related to Superstorm Sandy, Trafford Mayor Rey Peduzzi said.
Trafford police and flaggers will control traffic at the intersection of Forbes Road and Route 130.
State officials did not identify delivery times, but Peduzzi said borough officials anticipated the deliveries would happen between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
“It's not going to affect the morning rush hour,” Peduzzi said.
Construction on the bridge started in April and is expected to end in late 2013.
Barring weather delays this winter, the $10.7-million project by Mosites Construction should be on schedule, transportation spokeswoman Valerie Petersen said.
“As of right now, it seems to be moving right along,” she said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.