Kiski Patrolman Scott Pontieri didn't know what was going on when a man called him over to his car about noon Wednesday.
“He handed a grenade to me,” said Pontieri, a Kiski Township officer for 23 years. “I took one look and carefully walked it over to our burn barrel. It was the only place I could think of.”
A former Kiski Township man found it in a garage in Vandergrift and drove it about six miles to deliver to township police.
The outside barrel was about 10 feet away, between the township building and fire department. Pontieri evacuated both, put up crime scene tape to keep people away and called the Allegheny County bomb squad.
The World War II Japanese grenade didn't explode, but bomb experts said hours later that the grenade possibly was live.
“An X-ray showed it possibly still be could live,” said township police Chief Jerrod Thompson.
He said the Type 97 grenade was found in a garage in the 500 block of Jackson Street by a man in his 50s who was cleaning out the garage for an older woman.
“He used to live here in the township, so he brought it to our station and handed it to our officer,” Thompson said.
At about 3:30 p.m., the World War II-era explosive was put into an armored chest and removed by a bomb specialist who wore protective clothing.
While the bomb squad was taking care of the explosive, Vandergrift police and a police dog were checking the garage and house to determine if there were any more World War II souvenirs inside.
None was found.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.