DeWeese seat goes to Snyder
Greene County Commission Chairwoman Pam Snyder handily defeated Waynesburg Councilman Mark W. Fischer in the race to represent the district previously held by disgraced former House leader Bill DeWeese.
Snyder, a Democrat, defeated Fischer, a Republican, 57.6 percent to 41.5 percent, according to preliminary results for the 50th District.
Snyder, 56, of Jefferson Township replaces DeWeese, 62, a Democrat and former state House Speaker, who held the seat for 36 years. DeWeese's name was stripped from the ballot after a jury convicted him of corruption charges last spring and a judge sentenced him to 21⁄2 to five years in state prison.
“I'm feeling wonderful ... really, really touched and overwhelmed,” Snyder said from the American Legion in Carmichaels.
Fischer, 50, of Waynesburg operates an antiques store in downtown Waynesburg. He said that although he was disappointed with the result, he ran a good campaign without taking large sums of money from special interests.
“I offered the voters a clear choice, someone without baggage … and they went with the status quo. That's unfortunate,” Fischer said.
Snyder unsuccessfully challenged DeWeese in the 2010 primary. She worked for eight years as deputy district director for the late U.S. Rep. Frank Mascara of Washington County.
Snyder said restoring funding to public education will be her top issue when she goes to Harrisburg in January so “our kids all have a fair and equitable chance at a good education.”
The 50th District includes all of Greene County; East Bethlehem Township and Centerville Borough in Washington County; and Brownsville, Masontown and Point Marion boroughs and German and Luzerne townships in Fayette County.
Kari Andren is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2856 or email@example.com.
Add Kari Andren to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.