Share This Page

Mercer County man charged in shooting of girl he mistook for skunk

| Thursday, Oct. 25, 2012, 6:58 p.m.

A Mercer County man was charged Thursday with aggravated assault, reckless endangerment and simple assault for shooting an 8-year-old girl he mistook for a skunk.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled Nov. 1 for Thomas Edward Grant, 24, of Jackson Center, who is accused of shooting his cousin during a Halloween party Saturday night outside his mother's home along Brewer Road in New Sewickley in Beaver County.

Township police Chief Ronald Leindecker said the girl, who was dressed in a black Halloween costume and a black hat with a white feather and playing hide-and-seek, remains hospitalized in critical condition.

Leindecker, whose department investigated the case along with Pennsylvania Game Commission officers, has said that Grant's mother, Janet Grant, was told there was a skunk in the backyard and she told her son to get his shotgun and shoot it.

Two witnesses told police that they couldn't be sure if it was a skunk because it was dark and that a brighter flashlight was needed.

Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or at mhasch@tribweb.com

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.