Judge: Absentee ballots submitted before end of Election Day will be counted
By Adam Brandolph
Published: Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2012, 3:38 p.m.
An Allegheny County judge on Tuesday agreed to extend the deadline for counting absentee voter ballots by two days because of Sandy.
Ballots received after 5 p.m. on Friday but before the end of Election Day would be counted for the presidential election — but sequestered for challenges.
Common Pleas Judge Joseph M. James denied a request to extend the deadline for accepting ballot applications.
“The courthouse has been open. The county is not under water,” he said.
Gov. Tom Corbett on Monday said he would extend the deadline for ballot applications to 5 p.m. Friday in some counties because courthouses closed. Corbett said counties could extend the deadline by one day for each day the courthouse closed this week.
Cliff Levine, a lawyer for the Democratic Party of Allegheny County, said the governor's order “falls short.”
Ron Hicks, a lawyer for the Republican Party, said the Board of Elections did not discuss extending the deadline. He said he might appeal the ruling.
Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.