ShareThis Page

Testimony: Victim surprised when nephew shot him in Rostraver

| Thursday, Nov. 1, 2012, 12:02 a.m.

Adonta Rainey told a Westmoreland County jury Wednesday that he didn't expect to get shot earlier this year when he followed his nephew to a secluded area of Rostraver Township.

Rainey said he thought he and Keyonta McIntyre, 19, were going to talk or fight when their two cars came to a stop outside Rostraver Apartments on May 31.

During the first day of McIntyre's attempted murder trial, Rainey, 24, told jurors that his nephew walked toward him, pulled a black gun and fired twice, hitting him once in the chest.

“At first I couldn't believe it. I looked down and saw a hole in my chest,” Rainey testified.

Police contend McIntyre, who is charged with aggravated assault and a firearms offense, lured his uncle from a Monessen gas station, where he had just purchased two packs of cigarettes, to an ambush.

McIntyre and Rainey never spoke, but Rainey testified he was waved on by his nephew, indicating for his uncle to follow him down the road.

After he was shot, Rainey drove back to the gas station, where two women called for help.

Rainey told jurors he was hospitalized for several days after the shooting. He said he still suffers pain from his wound.

Rainey testified he and McIntyre were at one time close and previously had lived together. The relationship fell apart when McIntyre began dating the mother of Rainey's baby, he told jurors.

Public Defender Jack Manderino told jurors in an opening statement that McIntyre acted in self-defense.

“Rainey's credibility will certainly be in question,” Manderino said.

“Because of the tension between Rainey and his nephew, he knew there could be some trouble, but he continued to follow him?” Manderino asked rhetorically.

The trial will continue this morning as Assistant District Attorney Jackie Knupp resumes presenting evidence before Judge John Blahovec.

Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.