Fayette County man sues, says he was fired after complaining about weatherization program
A Point Marion man claims in a federal lawsuit filed Wednesday that top officials at the Redevelopment Authority of Fayette County fired him in May after he filed complaints that led the state Inspector General's Office to investigate the authority's weatherization program in February and March.
Michael Volek says in the lawsuit that as a home energy auditor for the program, he saw officials buying new furnaces for people who didn't need them and giving preferential treatment to authority members' friends and relatives who were on the waiting list to receive heating assistance.
Volek is suing the authority, Executive Director Andrew French and two other officials, Al Jeffries and Warren Hatfield. French couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
A spokeswoman for the Inspector General couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.