Crash closes Route 422
PLUMCREEK — Both lanes of Route 422 were closed for about seven hours on Friday morning after a tractor trailer involved in a wreck leaked about 300 gallons of diesel fuel.
State police said a car driven by Lindsey Merlock, 18, of Kittanning, entered Route 422 from Cherry Run Road and crossed into the path of a 2012 Freightliner driven by James Klinger, 59, of Dalmatia (Northumberland County), traveling westward shortly after 4 a.m.
Police said Merlock apparently fell asleep at the wheel.
She survived the impact and was taken to ACMH Hospital for treatment of minor injuries. The truck driver was not injured in the crash.
The truck overturned, causing the diesel fuel to spill onto the road, police said. Refrigerant was also spilled onto the road, county officials said. Officials said the truck was carrying a load of pierogies.
The spill and cleanup forced the closure of the highway.
McCutcheon Enterprise, of Allegheny Township was called for the cleanup,
Armstrong County's HAZMAT team was at the accident scene.
“The roadway was already very wet from rain,” said Armstrong County HAZMAT coordinator Vince Cappo. “Conditions were compounded by the fuel-water mixture.”
A PennDOT spokesperson said the road was closed from Route 210 to Margaret Road.
In addition, a utility pole was sheared off in the accident. Crews worked to replace the pole during the morning.
Traffic was detoured around the crash along Seldom Seen Road to Margaret Road.
“PennDOT set up a pretty good detour,” said Cappo.
Route 422 was reopened around 11 a.m.
Mitch Fryer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.