2 plead guilty to disorderly conduct
By Brigid Beatty
Published: Saturday, Nov. 3, 2012, 2:41 a.m.
KITTANNING – The last two defendants charged in connection with a prostitution sting in Worthington have pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct charges this week in exchange for having their most serious misdemeanor charges of patronizing prostitutes withdrawn.
Robert Clifford Wellman, 58, of Butler, pled guilty before District Judge James Owen Friday.
According to court records, Steven Anthony Chowan, 28, of North Huntington, was not present in Judge Owen's courtroom Wednesday but was represented by his attorney, Jason Richard Lewis, who entered the guilty plea on Chowan's behalf.
The other six men charged in connection with the sting had all been similarly charged and all pleaded guilty to the summary charge of disorderly conduct in district court on Oct. 17 in exchange for each of their misdemeanor charges being withdrawn.
No other individuals have been charged or will be charged in connection with the sting operation, Worthington Police Chief William DeForte said.
Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.