Share This Page

Pittsburgh councilman wants to revamp parking in CMU area

| Monday, Nov. 5, 2012, 11:10 a.m.

Hourly parking rates around Carnegie Mellon University tripled in recent years and could go up even more if Pittsburgh officials approve pricing based on supply and demand.

City Councilman Bill Peduto on Monday introduced a resolution that would allow the city's Parking Authority, Carnegie Mellon's Tepper School of Business and Phipps Conservatory to try the system for a year. It would involve charging more for prime spaces during peak hours but could lower rates overall, with off-peak pricing running less than the current $2 per hour.

“It will give us more information to make a good decision,” Peduto said. “This hopefully will allow us to look at how parking meters can be best utilized.”

The system would cover approximately 300 parking spaces on Carnegie Mellon's campus and the surrounding area starting in January, Peduto said. Professors Mark Fichman and Stephen Spear plan to study how to implement it elsewhere in Pittsburgh.

Seattle implemented a similar pricing system in 2010 to help it reach a goal of having one or two parking spaces available per block during peak hours, said Mike Estey, the Seattle Department of Transportation's parking manager.

In 2011, Seattle raised rates to $4 per hour in four high-demand neighborhoods and lowered rates in 11 others, he said. This year, it kept rates the same but increased the maximum time to park, in order to bolster traffic in some areas where use decreased even with lower rates.

“Where we raised rates ... a lot of people still parked there but you could find a parking space,” Estey said.

Pittsburgh Parking Authority officials could not be reached for comment. City Council is scheduled to vote on the resolution Nov. 13.

Parking used to cost 50 cents an hour at coin-operated meters around Carnegie Mellon's campus, but motorists rarely found open spaces.

“It was like finding gold if you found a spot around here then,” said Eyona Bivins, 28, an administrative coordinator at the university.

Many people stopped parking on Frew Street and other metered spots on campus when rates increased last year to $1.75 an hour, she said. They came back when the authority recently installed multi-space kiosks that take cash and credit cards, even though prices increased to $2 an hour, Bivins said.

She typically parks for free in Schenley Park. “It's a 10-minute walk, but I save 16 bucks.”

A price increase on Frew likely would send Dave Nakles looking for cheaper options such as a garage, he said.

“When it used to be meters, you couldn't find a spot here — ever. If you didn't get here by 8:30 a.m., you were dead,” said Nakles, 63, an adjunct professor in the civil and environmental engineering department who often pays to park for three or four hours.

That could change with a price increase.

“I bet I wouldn't do it if I was going to be here for more than an hour or two,” he said. “It's getting close to that now.”

Jason Cato is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7936 or jcato@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.