Excela pitches outpatient facility
By Joe Napsha
Published: Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Excela Health on Monday disclosed preliminary plans for a proposed 114,000-square-foot outpatient medical facility on a 27-acre parcel south of Route 30 in Unity — a project it hopes to start building by summer.
The medical mall concept that Excela is proposing for the Unity site behind Arnold Palmer Motors on Route 30 would make health care more easily accessible for patients by placing their primary care physicians, specialists, rehabilitation and diagnostic services under one roof, Michael D. Busch, Excela's chief operating officer, told the township planning commission. The outpatient facility would consolidate services offered patients in about 20 locations in the Latrobe area, Busch said.
“This project is consistent with our strategic plan of two years ago. We will provide patients a level of coordinated care,” under one roof, Busch said.
The preliminary plan allows for the possibility of expansion.
But it was the accessibility to the site that most concerned planning commission members who viewed the plan for the three-story facility. Motorists would be able to access the complex from a road off Route 30 adjacent to the Mountain Laurel Plaza and from a new road off Arnold Palmer Drive, about 500 feet east of Palmer's Springhill Suites hotel.
The plan, however, does not include improvements to Giffin Drive, an access road from Route 30 into the medical facility, said Daniel Schmidt, township engineer. The road should be made a two-way street from the Burger King restaurant to the facility, Schmidt said. The road is one-way from the Burger King into the parking lot for Lowe's and Wal-Mart Stores, Schmidt said.
Planning commission members questioned why a road would not be built connecting the medical facility site to Mountain Laurel Plaza, but Bryan Clement, an engineer with H.F. Lenz Co. of Johnstown, said the plaza owner and Giant Eagle Supermarkets Inc., a major tenant, rejected the idea of connecting the two developments.
Planning commission member Gabe Monzo suggested that Excela design a plan for a road connecting the Mountain Laurel Plaza to the medical facility.
The township supervisors could consider using eminent domain to take the necessary right-of-way to connect the medical facility site with the shopping plaza, Monzo said.
“There's not been a hammer for 15 years of dealing with the issue,” Tom Baumann, planning commission chairman, said in reference to using eminent domain.
But, Baumann added that he believes Excela does not “want to be the guinea pig” to go through the potentially long court process to have eminent domain approved.
”We don't want it to be held up for reasons out of our control,” Clement said.
The cost of the project has not yet been determined, Busch said. He said previously that the health system has the ability to finance the project. The health system still is negotiating to buy the property from Colony Associates, Busch said.
Excela is expected to return to the planning commission in December with a final site plan that could be reviewed for possible recommendation for approval by the township supervisors.
Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-3562 or email@example.com
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.