Crucial Ohio voters shed light on their presidential pick
EAST SPARTA, Ohio – Regardless of the outcome of Tuesday's presidential election, Americans lose, according to dissatisfied voters in rural Stark County.
“It's a ridiculous election,” said Amy Rice, 26, of Canton South, shortly after casting her ballot for Republican candidate Mitt Romney. “Romney is not the best candidate; there are no winners here. I'm just voting to keep our rights.”
Romney and President Barack Obama will closely monitor results in Stark County. Michael Barrone, political analyst and author of the book “The Almanac of American Politics,” said Stark County is a bellwether in a crucial swing state. The outcome here should give the candidates a better idea of their chances statewide, he said.
Obama won here in 2008, beating John McCain 51.59 percent to 46.14 percent. In 2004, the county narrowly backed John Kerry against George W. Bush, and in 2000, Bush beat Al Gore by about 3,000 votes among 160,000 ballots cast.
Rice and her boyfriend, Tim Boyle, 25, said they do not identify with a political party. Rather, they call themselves pro-Americans or constitutionalists.
“I own a private security/bodyguard company, so the right to bear arms is important to me,” Boyle said.
Boyle served in the Army and fought overseas in Iraq and Afghanistan. He said he is disappointed that Obama focuses on welfare programs “for people who just sit at home and do nothing” while returning vets struggle to find jobs.
“To have guys who have given everything they have coming home and they can't find work, it's not right,”' he said. Most of his employees are veterans, he said.
Josh Wehr, 22, of East Sparta voted for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate.
It's time Americans had a viable third party candidate, he said. Johnson in recent days said the Libertarian ticket can get 5 percent of the vote and thereby establish itself as a relevant player in American politics.
“It's always Democrats and Republicans, and I don't agree with the policies of Obama or Romney,” Wehr said. “It's time for a change. We definitely have a chance for a third party.”
Wehr, who is gay, said he supports Johnson in part because he endorses gay marriage.
Obama said in an interview this year that his views of gay marriage have “evolved” to the point that he now endorses such unions. But Wehr said Obama has not done enough.
“He repealed ‘don't ask, don't tell,' but Obama still has a long way to go,” Wehr said. “He's had four years to make plenty of changes, and he didn't.”
In Tuscarawas, Ohio, voters like Ann Clark and Patrick Fox illustrate just how close the race is, and how difficult it's been for pundits to predict the outcome here.
Clark is a registered Republican. Yet, she voted for President Barack Obama.
Fox, an independent, voted for Obama in 2008. Republican challenger Mitt Romney got his vote this time around.
Clark, 37, of Massillon, said she cares about the environment and global warming. That's why she voted for Obama.
“There is a vast difference between the two candidates, though it didn't come up much during the campaigns,” Clark, a teacher, said. Obama will address climate change, she added. Romney will not, she believes.
For Fox, the dealbreaker was Obama's universal healthcare plan. He is a physical therapist and said he is “afraid of Obamacare” and what it might mean for other healthcare professionals.
He also does not appreciate “Obama trying to force churches to provide birth control to employees,” he said.
In 2008, Fox swung his support to Obama after Republican candidate Sen. John McCain selected Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate.
“It was kind of scary to see that Palin could be that close to being president,” Fox said.
He wishes more voters would eschew party politics and vote election-by-election.
“You can't believe everything the Republicans say or everything the Democrats say,” he said. “I really think being committed to one party is not healthy.”
Clark is rethinking her party allegiance, especially after several Republican officials made controversial statements this campaign concerning rape, and threatened to cut funding for Planned Parenthood.
“It feels like there's no place for women in the Republican Party,” she said. “The candidates seem to be against women's rights. Planned Parenthood provides preventative care – to take that away from poorer people is just irresponsible.”
In Canton, the county seat of Stark County, Derek Long has known for years how he would vote.
A 21-year-old black man, Long, voting in his first presidential election, supports Obama, saying he still is stunned that the Democrat won in 2008.
“I never even thought we'd have a black vice president,” Long said Tuesday morning outside the VFW Post 3747 polling place. “I mean, there's still racism, I don't care what anybody says. But at least we can vote for a black man now.”
Others pray Obama doesn't win again, and said race has nothing to do with it.
“Republicans are people who have something to protect; Democrats are people who want something,” said John Klingaman, 45, who owns a machinery repair business in Canton. “I want to protect what I have. I voted for Mitt Romney.”
Pre-school teacher Kelsey Kane, 21, also voted in her first presidential election Tuesday. She backed Obama.
Unlike others in this campaign-weary state, Kane said she enjoyed being the center of the candidates' attention. She watched every debate and never tired of the ubiquitous political ads.
“I thought it was kind of neat,” she said. “It was kind of cool that we were the only state people relied on.”
Long supports Obama not only because of his skin color, but because of his support for college grants and debt relief. He is a student at Stark State College in North Canton, and works 35 hours a week as a restaurant cook to help pay for tuition, he said.
“Obama is the only one who can relate to what I'm going through now,” he said. “Romney can't relate to me at all.”
Though Klingaman backs Romney, he is not optimistic about the Republican's chances.
He criticized Romney's campaign, saying he alienated blacks, gays and -- most recently -- women with his anti-abortion views.
“I don't think he's going to win,” he said. “I think we're done for.”
Whoever wins, he may have to wait a few days to find out. Paul Sracic, chair of the Political Science Department at Youngstown State University, said he expects vote-counting in Ohio to drag on for a while.
“I've seen where there will be 100,000 provisional ballots cast, and I have a hard time seeing this election being won by 100,000 votes,” he said. “If that's the case, then we're in court.”
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.