Greensburg council doesn't expect tax increase
Greensburg City Council will explain the proposed 2013 budget during its regular meeting next week.
“We don't believe they'll be a need for a tax increase,” City Administrator Sue Trout said after a council meeting on Tuesday.
The general fund to be presented on Tuesday totals about $11 million, city officials said.
Council expects to make a decision during next week's meeting on selling South Pennsylvania Avenue property the city owns.
Mayor Ron Silvis conceded the sale of 100-108 S. Pennsylvania Ave. has helped balance the next budget, but added he and council want to sell because they believe government shouldn't own real estate.
Five bids have been submitted for the building that houses stores Katwalk, Mancuso's Shoe Repair, Golf for Her, Herbs to Your Health, and Lapels: A Fine Men's Store, along with two adjoining parking areas.
The bids are attorney Greg Moore of Greensburg, $541,003; CTO Group LLC of Greensburg, $475,000; The Buncher Co. of Pittsburgh, $475,000-$575,000; The B5 Group LLC of Murrysville, $490,000; attorney David Robinson of Greensburg, $510,100.
“There were a lot of items in each bid we need to talk about with (solicitor Bernard McArdle),” Trout told council, adding she believes a recommendation can be made by Tuesday.
In a related matter, council will vote on a lease for one of the tenants in the building.
City officials are proposing a two-year lease for Judy DiNardo, owner of Golf for Her, starting Nov 1. Her cost would be 5 percent less than the $975 per month she had been paying, or $928, city officials said.
The reduction compensates DiNardo for the amount of her previous rent, McArdle explained.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.