Rape, assault charges dropped against Aliquippa man
By Tim Karan
Published: Thursday, Nov. 8, 2012, 1:11 a.m.
The man who allegedly held his ex-girlfriend hostage with a bomb at her Worthington home last month waived his right to a preliminary hearing Wednesday.
Keith L. Kammerdeiner, 38, of Aliquippa is accused of binding the hands and legs of his 27-year-old ex-girlfriend, spraying her with mace and sexually assaulting her at knife-point for several hours before she managed to escape.
He also left a homemade explosive device near the home, police said, which authorities discovered the following week.
Kammerdeiner, who appeared coherent and cooperative in court, agreed to waive his right to a preliminary hearing before District Judge James Owen in Kittanning in exchange for prosecutors dropping one count of rape and another count of aggravated indecent assault.
Kammerdeiner had faced two counts of both charges, but District Attorney Scott Andreassi said the prosecution is willing to withdraw one of each because they stem from the same incident. In addition, Kammerdeiner faces charges of risking a catastrophe, making terroristic threats, unlawful restraint, aggravated assault, simple assault and indecent assault.
Kammerdeiner is in Armstrong County Jail awaiting further court proceedings. His bail remains set at $150,000.
Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.