Butler County appoints executive assistant as chief clerk
Two Butler County commissioners on Thursday appointed an executive assistant as the county's chief clerk.
Amy Wilson, the assistant for Commissioner A. Dale Pinkerton, assumed the duties of Bill O'Donnell, who retired after 20 years as chief clerk and director of administration. He could earn up to $18,750 for 375 hours of work as a consultant to help finish budgetary and other matters.
Pinkerton and Commission Chairman Bill McCarrier appointed Wilson, even though minority Commissioner James Eckstein said the county should have posted the job and searched outside of Butler government for someone with an accounting degree.
“For morale and to do the right thing, this should not be a political appointment,” Eckstein said.
Pinkerton and McCarrier said they think Wilson is qualified.
The salary board, composed of the commissioners and Controller Jack McMillin, set Wilson's salary at $81,515. O'Donnell earned just over $101,000.
McMillin provided paperwork showing Wilson will earn $85,183, beginning in January, and is scheduled to receive pay raises in November 2013 and November 2014 that would bring her salary to $93,551.
Eckstein voted against the entire package.
An employee of the District Attorney's Office, Linda Cranmer, resigned on Nov. 2, the county personnel office confirmed. District Attorney Richard Goldinger last month suspended Cranmer without pay, blaming her for missing a deadline that cost the county a $400,000 federal grant for domestic violence programs.
Cranmer, 52, has said Goldinger knew she had trouble submitting an electronic application for the money, and that the Justice Department extended the deadline and told her it had received the application.
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.