Steeler Ta'amu to stand trial after allegedly fleeing from police, crashing into cars in the South Side
A Pittsburgh Steelers rookie will stand trial on assault and drunken driving charges.
Alameda Ta'amu waived his right to a preliminary hearing before District Judge Oscar Petite on Thursday. Afterward, with attorney Robert DelGreco at his side, he expressed remorse. Ta'amu's mother accompanied him to the hearing in Pittsburgh Municipal Court.
“I'm sorry,” Ta'amu said. “Sorry is the only word I can say right now.”
Pittsburgh police accused him of fleeing from police, crashing into vehicles and then fighting with officers in the South Side on Oct. 14.
The nose tackle was temporarily suspended from the team.
“He is contrite,” DelGreco said. “He has accepted responsibility, and he is in counseling.”
On Thursday afternoon in the Steelers locker room, Ta'amu, 22, said the team has supported him.
“I have good teammates, and they've helped me a lot. (Bret) Keisel, Casey (Hampton), guys like that, they really have helped me move past this as far as the team is concerned,” Ta'amu said. “I wouldn't say that football is an escape for me, but being in this locker room is a home away from home for me, and I'm comfortable with that.
“So, I'm really fortunate to be on a team like the Steelers, one that has supported me from the very beginning. I really don't have any family in Pittsburgh,” said Ta'amu, of Kent, Wash., “but some of the guys have come over my house. So, that's always nice. And my mom has been here, living with me, for about three weeks now.”
Staff writer Mark Kaboly contributed to this report. Margaret Harding is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8519 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.