ShareThis Page

Commissioner to Fayette prison panel: 'We're going to make a difference'

| Friday, Nov. 9, 2012, 12:02 a.m.

Members of Fayette County's Prison Working Group met for the first time Thursday.

Commissioner Al Ambrosini told the group they will meet monthly for up to 18 months to discuss ways to improve operations at the prison. In addition, they will examine whether a new prison is needed or if the existing facility can be renovated.

“But that's not the goal,” Ambrosini told the group. “The goal is to help people. We're going to make a difference in people's lives.”

Members will look at ways to reduce recidivism, possibly through new programs aimed at helping inmates develop job skills or to address substance abuse and mental health issues, Ambrosini said. In addition, the group will explore ways to make the facility safer for inmates and corrections officers.

He noted commissioners already are looking at opening a day reporting center, which will allow nonviolent offenders to serve part of their sentences in a supervised setting outside of the jail. Participants would call in daily to the center and appear weekly for drug and alcohol testing and counseling.

The group was divided into smaller teams. Each will study a different issue — mental health, and drug and alcohol, financial and architectural.

Attending the meeting were Ambrosini, Warden Brian Miller, Controller Sean Lally, retired state trooper James Killinger, prison chaplain the Rev. Terry Sanders, Children and Youth Services Director Gina D'Auria, Emergency Management Director Guy Napolillo, Deputy Jim Custer, Public Works Director Robert Carson, Information Technology Director Kebin Holbert, Prison Business Manager Jack Loughry, UMW Local 9113 President Michael Hicks and Clinton Anderson, who represented Behavioral Health Administration Director Lisa Ferris.

Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.