Suspect flees while in hospital's care
By Paul Peirce
Published: Thursday, Nov. 8, 2012, 8:53 p.m.
Jeannette Police have obtained an arrest warrant for a 28-year-old man who is accused of assaulting his girlfriend and then fleeing while he was being treated at Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital in Greensburg.
Michael J. Perry III of South Third Street, Jeannette, is wanted on charges of aggravated assault, simple assault, harassment, public drunkenness, reckless endangerment and escape, according to a warrant signed by District Judge Joseph DeMarchis.
Officer Elliott Fejes reported that police were summoned to an apartment about 7:36 p.m. on Oct. 31 by a woman who alleged that a drunken Perry had just assaulted her. The woman required treatment at the Greensburg hospital for her injuries, according to police.
After a brief search, police found Perry walking in a nearby alley. He attempted to flee but was caught hiding between two buildings near Clay Avenue.
While Perry was being processed at the police station, he claimed he felt dizzy and needed medical treatment for a cut. Jeannette Emergency Medical Service took Perry to the hospital. Police planned to take him to the county jail after he was treated.
At about 1 a.m. on Nov. 1, an emergency room employee contacted police “to advise Michael Perry did rip out his IV from his arm and was seen running out of the emergency room,” Fejes said in a report.
Anyone with information on Perry's whereabouts is asked to telephone police at 724-527-4013.
Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.