A Sewickley Hills man who crashed his car late Saturday after leading a state trooper on a chase at speeds approaching 100 mph repeatedly begged officers to kill him, authorities say.
Gregory Wayne Omlor, 23, was in Allegheny County Jail after being charged shortly before midnight Saturday with drunken driving, resisting arrest, numerous traffic violations and aggravated assault on Trooper Andrew S. Reith and Pittsburgh police officers Daniel Stangrecki and Mark Pisano.
Court documents say Reith spotted Omlor's gold Toyota Corolla weaving in and out of his lane while driving south on Interstate 279 toward the East Street exit. When Reith tried to pull him over, Omlor began speeding through traffic before skidding through the right bend in the highway just past the West End Bridge exit, spinning his car across both lanes of Route 65 before slamming into a concrete barrier.
While handcuffed, Omlor appeared drunk but uninjured and grew increasingly belligerent before saying he wanted someone "to end it for me" and to "just shoot me," records say. While a tow truck driver, Thomas O'Connor, and Reith tried to restrain Omlor, he kicked the trooper's chest twice, according to court documents.
Taken to Allegheny General Hospital, North Side, by the Pittsburgh officers, Omlor refused to remain seated - shouting, "What will it take for you to shoot me?" - before he kicked Pisano in the leg and Stangrecki in the knee, forcing them and several hospital security guards to restrain him, authorities said.
Carl Prine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7826 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.