No tax hike in Upper Tyrone
Residents in Upper Tyrone Township will not see a property tax increase in 2013.
Supervisors Tuesday passed a tentative 2013 spending plan.
The proposed budget sets revenues and expenditures at $281,612.
The tax rate would remain at .642 mills. Supervisors plan to adopt the final budget at the meeting on Dec. 11.
In other business, supervisors passed a motion to direct the township secretary to advertise an intent to appoint a certified or competent public accountant to conduct the audit for all of the accounts of the township for 2012.
They plan to make the appointment at the December meeting. Supervisor Sam Killinger abstained from the vote since his wife is a township auditor.
Supervisors agreed to hire Debbie Rulli to assist with filing on a part-time basis at the rate of $10 an hour.
Supervisor Bill Edwards said the reason for the hire is because the township has a lot of old records that have to be destroyed and Rulli will be helping the secretary go through all of them. Killinger voted no to this motion.
Resident Scott Keller questioned why, in both instances, the supervisors are looking at hiring or are hiring individuals to do the work of people that are already appointed or hired by the township.
“Why would you hire someone when we have people to do these things,” he said. “You're just spending money that doesn't need to be spent.”
Keller questioned why supervisors were paving alleys now. Edwards said that while it's not a common practice, it has been done in the past.
Rachel Basinger is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.