Tri-Town Community Watch is formed
More than 40 Tri-Town residents attended the first meeting of the Tri-Town Community Watch Wednesday night at the Dawson Fire Hall.
The crime watch was started by Dawson officials who were concerned with the number of criminal incidents in the area in the past few weeks, including burglaries and attempted burglaries.
The group elected officers.
In attendance Wednesday was Stephani Plume, a trooper with the state police from Uniontown barracks. She is the community services/public information officer. Plume answered questions and passed out literature concerning community watches and keeping safe from various crimes.
“Crime watch is about getting you involved,” Plume said. “Get to know your neighbors. Keep an eye out for one another.”
Plume said it's not considered being nosey if a neighbor is aware of another neighbor's routine so when something odd is seen, information can be written down and verified by speaking to that neighbor.
Dawson Mayor Carol Capella said a Facebook page has been created under the name “Tri-Town Comm Watch” where members can post information about things they saw that appear out of the ordinary and to make other members aware of such incidents.
“This is our fastest way to communicate,” Capella said. She will add information from each meeting for those who cannot make it.
Plume was pleased with the addition of the Facebook page, noting that she's not aware of any other crime watches having a page.
The next Tri-Town Community Watch meeting will take place sometime in January.
Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-626-3539 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.