Vanderbilt Borough Council passed its tentative budget with no expected tax increase for 2013.
Council members this week unanimously voted to approve the tentative budget in the general fund with $36,410 of total expected revenues, including $22,000 in wage taxes, $7,000 in real estate taxes, $1,400 in per capita taxes and $1,700 in fines and forfeits.
Expected expenditures include $4,100 in insurance, $2,900 in legal fees and advertising, $4,700 in street lighting and $5,000 in equipment purchases, bringing that total to $30,375.
The budget comes with no tax increase as council voted to advertise its tax ordinance with the millage rate to remain the same at 1.04 mills.
Council will vote on the final budget during its Dec. 18 regular meeting.
In other business, council voted to adopt an ordinance for numbering houses in the borough. The plan is for the safety and welfare of the public for emergency service workers responding to fires or other emergency situations.
According to the ordinance, the numbers for homes and businesses should be in paint, wood, enamel or other material approved by the borough, measure at least 3 inches in height and contrast to the background colors where it is placed.
Also, the numbers should be on or over a front door, on the front transom bar, the front transom glass, the front show window, or over or on either side of the entrance to such house or business. Blocking the number would be considered a violation.
A violation of the ordinance will bring a fine up to $1,000 or 90 days in prison.
Mark Hofmann is a writer with Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.