Suspect shot by Pittsburgh police; officer hurt
A police officer was injured and shot a suspect Sunday night after an attempted traffic stop turned into a crash along the border of Highland Park and East Liberty, authorities said.
Shortly before 10 p.m., Zone 5 officers stopped a vehicle with one occupant near the intersection of Stanton Avenue and Farragut Street for a routine traffic stop, Deputy Chief Paul Donaldson said.
As the two officers stood on either side of the vehicle, the driver attempted to take off, and the officer on the passenger side managed to jump into the vehicle to try and take it out of gear, Donaldson said. He and the driver struggled, and the officer shot the driver multiple times in self defense.
"The officer believed his life was in danger, and he took action," Donaldson said.
After traveling between 110 and 150 yards down Stanton Avenue, the suspect's vehicle crashed in the 6000 block, near the apartments associated with the Pittsburgh Theological Seminary. Residents there said they were surprised by the shooting, and had thought the noise had been merely a traffic accident until they saw more and more police rushing to the scene.
The suspect suffered multiple gunshot wounds and was taken to UPMC Presbyterian in serious condition, where he was undergoing surgery early Monday morning, Donaldson said. He was described only as a black male, about 20 years old.
The officer suffered injuries to his hand, wrist and arm, and was being treated at UPMC Mercy. Because officials could not fully interview either officer or suspect late Sunday night, they would not release either name, Donaldson said. The investigation into the shooting was ongoing,
The deputy chief also said it was too early to talk about charges.
Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5625, or firstname.lastname@example.org.</
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.