Penn-Trafford School District to borrow $9.5M for high school renovations
By Renatta Signorini
Published: Tuesday, Nov. 13, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Penn-Trafford school directors on Monday approved borrowing $9.5 million for renovations at the high school.
It's the first step in what Superintendent Thomas Butler described as a $30 million project at the school.
The district is beginning the design process and additional borrowing could be necessary in the coming years, he said.
Butler hopes to present a plan to the public during the summer and have a final design ready in the fall of 2013.
The high school's aging infrastructure — including piping and wiring — is in need of replacement.
The building was constructed in 1972 and renovated in 1996.
“We have to take care of the nuts and bolts of this building,” Butler said.
In addition, he envisions a cutting-edge building with flexible spaces for multiple uses. Beefing up science labs will be one of Butler's “must-haves.”
The board did not discuss the measure before voting unanimously.
“The board feels strongly that this building needs to be addressed,” Butler said earlier in the meeting.
No specific plans are in place for renovations at the high school or any other district building.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.