Clinton Township's property tax likely will remain the same next year.
The township supervisors were to pass a 2013 preliminary budget on Tuesday night that is close to $1 million.
The proposed budget of about $932,000 is about $100,000 more than this year's budget of $832,000.
“That's a hefty total budget there,” Supervisors Chairwoman Mary Zacherl said.
The current tax rate is 4.13 mills.
Revenues are expected to rise. Part of next year's boost comes from the more than $20,000 the township expects to receive from the township's Marcellus shale natural gas wells.
The township was initially told it would get closer to $30,000, but recently found out the exact number is $21,070.
It also expects to get a boost from increased earned income and local service tax money.
The township is also expected to receive more money from natural gas wells once it leases some township property for natural gas rights.
Township officials are considering bids from two gas companies, PennEnergy and Huntley & Huntley Inc., for five-year leases.
Last month, the supervisors said they wouldn't make a decision before Nov. 12, but now say they are still not close to accepting any bids.
There are no specific projects set for next year, but supervisors say they will continue to focus on road maintenance. “It's always on the roads,” Zacherl said.
Zacherl also said the township hopes to be able to put a trail in Spring Valley Park.
The township will vote to pass its final budget in December.
Sarah Kovash is a freelance writer. Comments regarding this story may be sent to 724-226-4666 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.