Share This Page

Three vie for Pittsburgh-NAACP presidency

| Monday, Nov. 12, 2012, 11:58 p.m.
Regina Ragin Dykes is running for president of the NAACP's Pittsburgh chapter.
Deborah Walker is running for president of the NAACP’s Pittsburgh chapter.
JASMINE GOLDBAND
Pittsburgh NAACP First Vice President and political action chair Constance Parker (Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review) .

The three candidates for president of the NAACP-Pittsburgh agree on at least one thing: the branch needs a new direction.

Deborah Walker, 57, of Allentown, Regina Ragin Dykes, 68, of East Liberty, and Constance “Connie” Parker, 70, of Penn Hills on Tuesday are seeking to lead the 97-year-old branch.

M. Gayle Moss, president for eight years, is not seeking re-election. She declined to comment.

Like many branches nationwide, the Hill District-based group is dealing with declining membership. Members do not have to live in Pittsburgh to join the branch, one of eight in Allegheny County, according to the national organization.

NAACP-Pittsburgh had about 5,000 members in the 1960s, but now has about 1,000 members, officials said. Even with the decline, the branch won an award for having the most members at the national conference this year, said Parker, the group's first vice-president for the past eight years.

Now that the country has a black president, some observers question the relevancy of the civil rights organization, whose Baltimore-based national office was founded in 1909.

The Pittsburgh candidates said disparities in education, employment, health and other socioeconomic indicators between people of color and whites keep the NAACP relevant.

“The issues are the same, the approach may be different in how we address the issues,” said Walker, who hears student conduct cases for the University of Pittsburgh as chief judicial officer. She is an adjunct professor at Pitt and Point Park University.

She wants to implement a five-point plan to revitalize the NAACP, including rebuilding to address critical issues such as voter suppression. Walker has a bachelor's degree in administration of justice and legal studies and a master's degree in public policy management from Pitt.

Dykes, who is pastor of New Life A.M.E. Church in Homewood, said her longtime involvement with the NAACP, including as the former prison affairs coordinator for 10 years, and community engagement make her the best person to lead the branch.

She ran unsuccessfully against Moss in 2010, but said she is running again because many members have expressed their disillusionment with the branch. She wants to work to mend relationships, she said.

“You can't bargain or sit at the bargaining table with people that you've made enemies of,” said Dykes, who has a bachelor's degree in liberal studies from Carlow University and master's degrees in psychology and Christian counseling through Almeda University's distance learning program.

Longtime NAACP member Parker said the group needs to bring more people into its planning.

“It's going to take the whole community” to make change, said Parker, who is the community relations coordinator for PennDOT's District 11. She took classes at Carnegie Mellon University in electrical engineering.

She has worked with the NAACP on projects such as a partnership with Duquesne University, in which law school students work on civil rights complaints the branch receives, she said.

Parker's daughter, former Pittsburgh Councilwoman Twanda Carlisle, works in the NAACP branch office.

Tory N. Parrish is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5662 or tparrish@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.