Man arrested in Fayette County deer-spotting shooting
A Fayette County man was arraigned Monday on charges of shooting a 17-year-old girl who was spotting deer late Sunday with her family, according to state police in Uniontown.
The girl, who was not identified by police, was taken to a Pittsburgh hospital on Sunday, police said.
Jeremy J. Pritts, 35, of Normalville, was arraigned on charges of aggravated assault, simple assault and reckless endangerment and released on a signature bond in connection with the shooting, according to online court documents.
Pritts was arraigned before Belle Vernon District Judge Jesse Cramer.
A preliminary hearing has been scheduled for Nov. 21 before Connellsville District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr.
Police said the girl was sitting in the back of her parent's pickup truck on Foxburg Road in Springfield Township at 10:40 p.m. Sunday when she “saw a flash from a porch and was struck with pellets from shotgun fire.”
The girl sustained shotgun-pellet wounds to her face, chest, abdomen and both arms, police said. Her parents were spotting deer when the teen was shot, police said.
The girl was treated at Highlands Hospital in Connellsville, then taken to UPMC Mercy Hospital in Pittsburgh “due to the seriousness of her injuries,” police said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.