Woman settles age-discrimination lawsuit against Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Nov. 13, 2012, 2:32 p.m.
An Ohio Township woman has settled her federal age-discrimination lawsuit against the Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania, which operates the Heinz History Center, according to court documents.
Terri Sue Blanchette, 50, claimed in the lawsuit that president and CEO Andrew Masich fired her to make way for “younger, blonde-haired women.” When she filed a discrimination claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the society twice changed its story about why she was fired, the lawsuit says.
The society said in its answer that Blanchette's claim about “younger, blond-haired women” was “irrelevant, immaterial, and impertinent, and thus should be stricken.” It also denied Masich fired her because of her age.
U.S. District Judge Mark Hornak on Tuesday approved a joint motion to dismiss the case. The motion doesn't provide any details of the settlement.
Sam Cordes, Blanchette's attorney; Scott Hardy, the society's attorney, and a spokesman for the Heinz History Center couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.