Ford City woman who caught herself on fire at gas station waives hearing
By Brigid Beatty
Published: Thursday, Nov. 15, 2012, 2:16 a.m.
KITTANNING — The Ford City woman charged with risking a catastrophe after setting herself on fire at the Shop 'n Save gas pumps in East Franklin in July waived her right to a preliminary hearing on Wednesday.
Christine Mecca, 51, limped into the courtroom of District Judge James Owen using a cane and leaning on the arm of her husband. Her right ankle and hand were heavily bandaged.
Mecca remained seated as the judge explained the conditions of her bail, which stipulated that she be released on her own recognizance. Her husband comforted her as she began to weep.
In addition to the felony charge, Mecca also faces a misdemeanor charge of reckless endangerment.
The charges were filed following an investigation into Mecca's actions on July 9.
The incident was caught on a security camera and, according to East Franklin police Sgt. William Evans, the footage showed Mecca spilling gas on the lower half of her body and starting the fire.
He said the fire was limited to Mecca's clothes and that three men rushed and tackled her as she screamed and flailed near a truck delivering fuel to the station.
Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.