Navy veteran, school administrator to offer financial recovery plan for Duquesne schools
By Rachel Weaver
Published: Friday, Nov. 16, 2012, 3:40 p.m.
The cash-strapped Duquesne City School District has a new guide for its financial future.
Secretary of Education Ron Tomalis on Friday appointed Paul Long, 63, as the district's chief recovery officer on Friday. Long will develop a fiscal and academic plan for the district, which members of the school board can accept or reject.
If they reject Long's plan, a receiver selected by Allegheny County Common Pleas Court will oversee the district. Regardless, the state-appointed Board of Control that has run the district since 2000 will now dissolve.
Long is a graduate of Shaler High School and the Naval Academy at Annapolis, Md.. He earned a master's degree in business administration and a doctorate in education from the University of Pennsylvania.
Long was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal and the Air Medal. He earned the rank of commander and achieved designation as a naval aviator and financial management subspecialist.
After serving 20 years in the Navy, Long began a career in administration in the North Allegheny School District. He then served as business administrator, acting superintendent and chief executive officer for the Pennsbury School District, Bucks County.
He is a member of the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators and the Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials.
Long also serves as chairman of the board of the Verland Foundation, which provides education, support and residential care to 230 intellectually disabled people in Western Pennsylvania.
Rachel Weaver is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7948 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.