Judge pleads guilty to improperly stopping at Bullskin accident scene
A Westmoreland County district judge was on the other side of the bench on Monday.
Charles “Chuck” David Moore, 52, of East Huntingdon, whose office is in Scottdale, pleaded guilty to a summary charge of improper stopping before Connellsville District Judge Ronald J. Haggerty Jr., according to court records.
State Trooper Robert Wilson of the Uniontown barracks alleged that Moore stopped at the scene of an accident on the “northbound passing lane of Route 119 and refused to move after firefighters advised him to keep moving,” according to one citation.
Moore's attorney, Kenneth Burkley, said the charges resulted from “a misunderstanding.”
“We think it was a misunderstanding by people at the scene,” Burkley said as he left Haggerty's office. “Mr. Moore's interests were to see if people he knew were OK because of (a vehicle) accident.”
Moore was not involved in the accident.
Haggerty dismissed three summary offenses filed in connection with the Oct. 3 accident shortly before 8 p.m. near Marion Motors in Bullskin.
Moore was ordered to pay a $25 fine and costs, Burkley said.
Moore declined comment.
The incident happened “in seconds,” Burkley said. “I think they were just caught up in the moment, in the quickness of everything.”
The judge was right to dismiss the other summary charges, Burkley said.
Moore was sworn in as a district judge in December, replacing J. Bruce King, who retired. He served as acting Westmoreland County sheriff before winning the district judge position in the November 2011 election.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.