ShareThis Page

Saxonburg police staffing decision delayed

| Tuesday, Nov. 20, 2012, 12:02 a.m.

Saxonburg council will wait until next month to make a decision on police department staffing for the rest of the year.

As a result, police Chief Joe Beachem will be the only officer on duty in the town of about 1,500 residents for at least the next two weeks.

He's been alternating between daylight and evening shifts since the second week of November, said Mayor Jody Pflueger, who oversees the department.

“The council president (William Gillespie Jr.) emailed me and asked me to take everyone off the schedule,” so the department wouldn't go over budget, Pflueger said.

Council budgeted $71,000 to pay the other 11 officers on the force, who are part time and earn $15 per hour. Beachem's salary is covered for the year.

Council was considering an additional $1,800 to staff the department with 40-hour-per-week coverage for the remaining three weeks in December.

The money would be issued to the department as a “loan,” Pflueger said. It would be deducted from the department's 2013 budget, which was cut by $20,000.

The department's 2012 budget is about $154,000.

Council called a special meeting for Monday afternoon to discuss the issue, but with two members absent, including Gillespie, it was decided to delay a decision.

The part-time officers' budget was depleted due to man-hours needed to investigate a bank robbery in February and a double suicide in January, Pflueger said.

Council heard Monday from several police officers and residents, most of whom urged council not to cut the police force to save money.

“The residents deserve to have us,” part-time officer Amy Dice, of Buffalo Township, told council. “I know it's a small town, the crime rate is pretty low, but you have to give a little bump to the PD for that.

“This is something that we can fix for the betterment of the community and the safety of the community.”

But resident David Bowne told council that the board should consider what the town can afford when making its decision regarding 2012 staffing.

“The issue here is not the quality of the police department, I'm sure they're all fine officers,” Bowne said. “The issue is what can we, as a borough, afford? We can't afford everything that we have and we have an obligation to adjust what we can't afford.”

Pflueger couldn't say whether having fewer officers on patrol will affect the crime rate, but she said she believes residents deserve a police department.

“The taxpayers pay to have a department, so it would be nice to have that and provide it to the community,” she said.

Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.