ShareThis Page

Ruling on expert witness delays Beaver County trial

| Monday, Nov. 19, 2012, 5:08 p.m.

State Superior Court will decide whether Beaver County prosecutors can call forensic pathologist Cyril H. Wecht as an expert witness in the trial of a former Bridgewater councilman accused of strangling his lover more than 30 years ago.

The trial for Gregory Scott Hopkins, 66, was supposed to start next week but will be delayed to allow the court to rule.

Hopkins resigned his council seat shortly after his arrest in January on a homicide charge. He's accused of killing Catherine Janet Walsh, 23, whose body was found on Sept. 1, 1979, inside her home in Monaca. Hopkins maintains his innocence.

His attorney, James J. Ross, has suggested that Walsh died during a consensual, but dangerous, sex act. Prosecutors say DNA evidence found on Walsh's nightgown and the cord that bound her hands linked Hopkins to the crime.

Ross said on Monday that he will ask the judge to reconsider setting bail for Hopkins.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.