City revives plans for $3M senior center in Beechview
Pittsburgh City Council revived legislation on Monday that would bring a long-awaited $3 million senior center to Beechview.
Councilwoman Natalia Rudiak introduced a bill earmarking $360,000 to buy a building at 1553 Broadway Ave. owned by Clements Okoye.
The money, along with equity from the building and $400,000 the city previously set aside, would allow the city to secure $1.5 million in matching funds from the state. The cost of buying and renovating the building is expected to total about $3 million.
“This has been a project that has been in the works for a long time,” Rudiak said. “It will be the first multimillion dollar investment in Beechview for as long as I can remember.”
Council in 2003 approved legislation for a lease with controversial developer Bernardo Katz, who owned numerous properties in the Beechview business district. Katz later left the country in default of mortgages with the Urban Redevelopment Authority and private lenders.
In 2008, the city attempted to buy the former St. Catherine's Church Elementary School and convert it to a senior center, but the deal was never finalized. St. Catherine's has since been demolished.
The city rents the basement of 1553 Broadway from Okoye for about $36,000 per year for senior programming.
“By buying this building, we will be able to renovate it and improve the services we provide daily to our seniors,” said Joanna Doven, spokeswoman for Mayor Luke Ravenstahl.
Rudiak said buying the 2½-story building could triple the amount of the space available to the city. She said a partnership with private parties could be explored to cut costs, floating the idea of a karate studio and ballet school.
Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.