Lakes being drained in effort to curtail weed growth
It's time to purge two Westmoreland County lakes of excessive weeds.
County parks workers this week started the process of lowering lake water levels at Twin Lakes Park and Mammoth Park in an effort to kill off the wild growth that has inundated the recreational bodies of water.
“The lakes will still be open but it will just be muddy along the shoreline,” said Greg McCloskey, the county's public works director.
Water levels at the 25-acre lower lake at Twin Lakes Park and the 21-acre lake at Mammoth Park will remain low until March.
The lakes will naturally refill in the spring from rainfall and snow melt, according to McCloskey.
The draining project is the second phase of work started last year to reduce weeds in the water. Last year, the county used nontoxic pellets to slow the weed growth.
Phase two will see water levels reduced by 8 to 10 feet, which will kill off about 50 percent of the remaining vegetation in the lakes, according to McCloskey.
“It will allow for better aquatic life, better fishing and better lives for water fowl,” McCloskey said.
Fishing and other recreational activities will be allowed to continue during the project.
According to the county's website, the Mammoth Park lake in Mt. Pleasant Township is used in the winter for ice fishing and ice skating.
Both lakes at Twin Lakes, in Hempfield and Unity townships, are used for ice fishing.
The water level is not being reduced in the upper lake.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.