Former prison guards sue over firings at SCI-Pittsburgh
Five former guards at the state prison in Woods Run who were fired in an investigation into allegations of inmate abuse sued six top Pennsylvania Department of Corrections officials on Monday.
In the lawsuit they filed in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh, Harry Nicoletti, Tory Kelly, Bruce Lowther, Brian Olinger and John Michaels claim corrections officials violated their due process rights and in Olinger's case subjected him to malicious prosecution.
Department of Corrections spokeswoman Susan McNaughton said the department does not comment on litigation.
The men seek damages for losses and illnesses they say they suffered because of their treatment during and immediately after the 2010-11 investigation that led to their dismissal from SCI-Pittsburgh. They named former state Corrections Secretary Shirley Moore Speal, Corrections Secretary John E. Wetzel, special investigators Gary Hiler and Michael Kondas, former SCI-Pittsburgh Superintendent Melvin Lockett and Superintendent Daniel Burns.
Three of the former officers — Nicoletti, Kelly and Lowther — await trial on state charges stemming from the investigation into allegations of sex crimes against inmates. A judge dismissed charges against Olinger during a preliminary hearing. Michaels was not charged.
Citing an arbitrator's findings that a state court overturned, the men claim the department failed to follow its own procedures when it dismissed them without explanation or permitting them to rebut the inmates' allegations.
Attorney Lawrence Fisher, who represents the former guards, referred to the investigation that led to his clients' firings as “an unconstitutional witch hunt” that was “based on the uncorroborated, unreliable word of convicted felons.”
Roy Pinto, president of the Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Association, said his organization supports the former officers' claims.
Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.