Former DEP Secretary John Hanger says he's a candidate for Pa. governor
By Timothy Puko
Published: Monday, Nov. 26, 2012, 3:44 p.m.
Former state Department of Environmental Protection Secretary John Hanger is the first to announce he intends to run for governor in 2014, staking an early spot in what could be a crowded field of Democrats.
Hanger, 55, of Hummelstown in Dauphin County plans official announcements in Philadelphia and Harrisburg on Wednesday and in Pittsburgh on Thursday, he said by phone Monday. He is building his campaign staff and declined to discuss his platforms or fundraising before those announcements.
Republican Gov. Tom Corbett noted this month that every governor since 1968, when the state constitution was amended to allow a second term, has served consecutive terms. “I don't plan on breaking that trend,” he said.
“We're going to be going early so we can put together a top-quality team,” Hanger, a lawyer, said. “It's obviously a big undertaking.”
It may be a big Democratic field, too.
York businessman Tom Wolf and Philadelphia millionaire Tom Knox have publicly declared interest in a gubernatorial campaign, inspired by big wins for Democrats in statewide elections this month, the Associated Press reported. High-profile officials including former U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak, Allentown Mayor Ed Pawlowski, state Treasurer Rob McCord and retiring state Auditor General Jack Wagner would not rule out gubernatorial runs in interviews for that story.
Timothy Puko is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.