Corbett says he'll cooperate with investigation into handling of Sandusky case
By Brad Bumsted
Published: Friday, Nov. 30, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
HARRISBURG — Gov. Tom Corbett said he probably will talk with attorney general's investigators reviewing his handling of the Jerry Sandusky sex-abuse case when he was the state's top law enforcement official.
In an interview Thursday with Capitol reporters, Corbett, attorney general from 2005-10, said he would cooperate unless he perceives that the investigation by incoming Democrat Kathleen Kane is political. She won election as attorney general on Nov. 6 and made Corbett's 33-month investigation of the Sandusky case a key campaign issue.
After she takes office in January, Kane will have all the investigators who handled the case in her employ, said Corbett, a Republican. But, the governor added, “Mrs. Kane doesn't have the right experience” to handle an internal investigation.
Kane could not be reached for comment.
A jury in June convicted Sandusky, 68, of molesting 10 boys over 15 years. He is serving a sentence of 30 to 60 years.
The former Penn State University assistant football coach once was a revered figure known for the charity he established called the Second Mile. It was intended to help disadvantaged children, but Sandusky found his victims there.
Corbett said the Penn State investigation, which revealed an alleged cover-up by administrators who are awaiting trial, took time because he used a grand jury.
The statewide grand jury meets one week per month, meaning a month's worth of work takes about four months.
“It made no sense for me to delay it” as some critics have charged, Corbett said.
Corbett was running for governor in the fall of 2010 while he was attorney general. Sandusky wasn't charged until a year after Corbett became governor and, therefore, a member of Penn State's board of trustees.
Kane, who prosecuted sex crimes as an assistant district attorney in Lackawanna County, said she has never used a grand jury.
Corbett disputed an ESPN Magazine report that he was “yukking it up” about former head coach Joe Paterno the night that trustees decided to fire Paterno.
He had dinner with several people, including Penn State professor and former Inquirer writer Russ Eshelman. He said he would not “yuk it up,” adding, “I'm a pretty cautious person.”
On a range of other topics, Corbett provided little insight into his evolving plans on transportation funding, state pension reform and privatizing the state liquor system.
Brad Bumsted is state Capitol reporter for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 717-787-1405 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.