Allegheny County budget talks continue
Two Allegheny County Councilmen agreed Tuesday to combine their budget proposal, a move that would restore $300,000 of the proposed cuts to the Controller's Office.
County Council plans to meet again Wednesday to continue discussions regarding Executive Rich Fitzgerald's $799.4 million proposed budget for 2013. In that proposal, Fitzgerald slashed Controller Chelsa Wagner's budget by 10 percent, or $647,000.
A plan by councilmen Michael Finnerty, D-Scott, and Bill Robinson, D-Hill District, would restore $300,000 to the office. Wagner said that level of funding would force 10 layoffs; Fitzgerald disputes that.
Council has not yet agreed to a millage rate to offset the rise in property values. Fitzgerald proposed rolling back the millage to 4.73.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.