Jeannette market robbery 'lookout' freed
A Jeannette man was set free Tuesday after serving nearly a year in jail for his role in the armed robbery of Antoniak's Market in Jeannette two years ago.
Nathaniel Crawford, 19, was sentenced to serve 11 1⁄2 to 23 months in jail and two years on probation for standing lookout as two other men barged into the neighborhood store, brandished guns and left with $71.
Crawford pleaded guilty in August to robbery and other offenses.
In court on Tuesday, defense attorney Owen Seman argued that Crawford, who had been in jail since his arrest on Dec. 11, 2011, learned his lesson.
“It was just flat-out stupid. Someone could have gotten hurt,” Seman said.
Westmoreland County Judge Debra Pezze rejected a request from the prosecution to have Crawford serve up to three years in jail. Pezze said Crawford, because of his age and no prior criminal record, did not deserve to be sent to a state prison.
After announcing the sentence, Pezze paroled Crawford.
“At this point, Mr. Crawford, you are a follower, and you followed the wrong people,” Pezze said.
Crawford's co-defendant, Eric Johnson, 20, formerly of Lancaster, pleaded guilty in March to robbery and was sentenced by Judge Al Bell to serve 18 to 36 months in prison.
Marielli A. McGowan, 22, of Jeannette, the third man police said was involved, is free on $50,000 bail awaiting trial, which is scheduled for January.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.