Hempfield supervisors budget $150K to fix damage workers inflicted on wetlands
By Richard Gazarik
Published: Saturday, Dec. 1, 2012, 9:01 p.m.
Hempfield taxpayers could pay as much as $150,000 next year to fix the damage done to wetlands in a township park when public works employees dredged a stream, according to the proposed 2013 budget.
The board of supervisors budgeted that amount for remediation work at Hempfield Park, though manager Andy Walz said the figure is an estimate.
“Obviously, we're preparing,” Walz said.
Board President Doug Weimer said the money was budgeted “in anticipation of the DEP consent order. We budgeted that money for future restoration of the wetlands.”
The figure doesn't include more than $32,000 the township has spent this year on preliminary work or a possible fine that could be leveled against Hempfield by the state Department of Environmental Protection for violating environmental laws.
The DEP is preparing a consent order that will require the township to fix the damage done when employees dredged 200 feet of a stream running through the park, widening the banks and dumping the debris into the wetlands. The dumping left a mound of dirt 200 feet long and 10 feet wide, according to a state inspection report.
The work violated state regulations governing the protection of wetlands, which are habitats for plants and wildlife.
The supervisors will not reveal who ordered the work, which was part of a plan proposed by Supervisor Jerry Fagert to build a pond in the park. Fagert oversees the Department of Public Works.
“We're waiting for the consent order that will help us conclude that,” Weimer said.
The state contends that plans were to alter the path of the stream, which is an unnamed tributary of Brush Creek, so the pond could be constructed. The work violated the Dam Safety and Environmental Water Encroachment Act, according to the DEP.
The cost of repairing damage to wetlands varies depending on the size of the area.
A study by the Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York estimated the remediation costs of wetlands at $3,500 to $80,000 per acre. The stream in Hempfield Park drains into a 640-acre area, according to an engineering report.
The state found plans submitted by the township inadequate for fixing the damage and returned them for revisions, documents show.
Richard Gazarik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6292 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.