ShareThis Page

Disbarred Fayette County lawyer Timperio charged with theft

| Saturday, Dec. 1, 2012, 5:03 p.m.

A disbarred Fayette County attorney was charged on Friday with theft and receiving stolen property by the state police organized crime task force.

According to criminal complaints filed with Uniontown District Judge Michael Metros, Nicholas E. Timperio Jr., 44, of Uniontown was arraigned on two counts of failing to make required restitution paid by former clients.

Trooper Mark Galli filed two complaints against Timperio.

The first involves Timperio's former client, Gregory Allen Lockhart, who told police that he hired Timperio to represent his grandson, John G. Gordon, in a criminal case.

After a preliminary hearing in May 2011, the complaint said, Timperio approached Lockhart and said that if $2,060 in restitution was paid in full within 30 days, the charges could be reduced or dismissed.

Lockhart said he asked for documentation before paying. After nearly 30 days, Lockhart and Gordon met with Timperio and gave him $2,060, requesting a receipt when the recipient was paid.

That recipient, the victim in the criminal case, told police in September that he had not received his restitution.

Restitution was made by Lockhart's new law firm, according to the complaint.

In the second case, Galli said, James Elwood Fisher Jr. hired Timperio to represent his fiancee, Janet Shaffer, in a criminal case.

Fisher told police that he gave Timperio $8,474 in required restitution in October 2010 and was provided with a receipt. That payment did not reach the clerk's office, the complaint stated, and Fisher paid the court directly.

In April, Timperio agreed to an involuntary disbarment rather than fight allegations made to the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania about misconduct involving six clients.

According to documents filed by the board, Timperio admitted to the charges against him by agreeing to the disbarment.

The board contended that Timperio violated the rules of professional conduct while he represented six clients in civil cases between 2003 and 2007 in Fayette County.

Two cases were contract disputes, and four involved personal injury cases.

Timperio could not be reached for comment.

On Friday afternoon, his law office at 80 E. Main St. in Uniontown was dark, deserted and locked.

A man who identified himself as a family member said he is not in contact with Timperio and did not know how to reach him.

After his arraignment, Timperio was freed on $25,000 unsecured bond in each case.

He faces a preliminary hearing before Metros on Jan. 22.

Mary Pickels is a staff writerfor Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-5401or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.