Monessen man accused of acquiring fake driver's license
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Dec. 1, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
A Monessen man faces a Dec. 7 preliminary hearing for illegally acquiring a second driver's license to obtain additional Social Security benefits.
Sergio Torres-Rosa, 56, was charged by state police Trooper William Coddington with two counts of tampering with public records and one count of falsifying public information before District Judge Joseph Dalfonso.
According to Coddington, the case was initiated after PennDOT's facial recognition software discovered a match between images on two separate operating license numbers.
Coddington said that one driver's license issued in 2001 was established as Sergio T. Rosa, and in 2005 a second license with the identical likeness was issued to Sergio Rosa.
According to police reports, Rosa established separate Social Security numbers at the same time and eventually collected $2,095 in fraudulent benefits.
Coddington said Social Security Administration agents are preparing theft charges to be filed separately against Rosa.
Rosa was released by Dalfonso on signature bond pending his preliminary hearing.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.