UPMC employees to use forum to air complaints about treatment
By Tony LaRussa
Published: Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
UPMC employees are being encouraged to use an Allegheny County Council hearing about the tax-exempt status of property owned by the health care giant to criticize how they are treated, according to a series of union-distributed flyers.
Copies of two flyers say the hearing is “to investigate UPMC's treatment of workers and the community.”
In one flyer, UPMC shuttle driver Al Turner is quoted as saying: “What kind of charity hospital pays its CEO almost $6 million a year and then tries to intimidate and silence workers who speak up for a way we can live on?”
The motion that council approved on Nov. 7 to discuss UPMC's tax-exempt status makes no mention of labor issues.
Both flyers indicate that they are being put out by a group called Make It Our UPMC/UPMC Employees United, which is a project of the Service Employees International Union.
Councilman James Ellenbogen, D-Banksville, said while he supports the idea of allowing people “to vent,” he questions whether Wednesday night's meeting is the right forum.
Tony LaRussa is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7987 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.